The Government’s case against legalizing same-sex marriage in India is weak. Here’s why.
A critique of the Centre’s arguments against same-sex marriage.
Legal Reasoning: Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. v. Union of India Writ Petition Criminal (No.) 76/2016
Surabhi Shukla’s analysis of the 6-9-18 Supreme Court verdict and legal reasoning of the case.
The Unbearable Wrongness of Koushal: IITians move Supreme Court against Sec 377
Twenty students and alumni of the Indian Institutes of Technology have filed a petition against the Koushal verdict on Section 377.
The Right to Privacy: The Promise for full Recognition of Transgender Rights
The Right to Privacy judgements most certainly include the right to one’s self-identified gender identity as upheld in NALSA v. Union of India.
Right to Privacy and Sec. 377
Yesterday, the Supreme Court gave its judgment in a case titled Justice Puttuswamy (Retd) v. Union of India [PDF link here]….
What the Right To Privacy judgment means for Section 377
The Right to Privacy judgment [PDF link here] earlier today in no way changes the status quo in relation to Section 377….
Not legal doesn’t mean illegal: The situation for queer individuals in India
Ritesh Rajani and Sourav Mandal discuss the legal aspects of leading queer lives in India.
Seeking participants for survey on Sec 377 and well-being
Online survey on Sec 377 and well-being for an IRB-approved student thesis.
Queering the Red: Asmita Sarkar, Jadavpur University
Asmita Sarkar represents LGBTIQ+ issues as a candidate for student elections at Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal.
Transgender individuals challenge Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code
Akkai Padmashali & Ors. vs. Union of India argue that Sec 377 violates the rights of transgender persons as set out in the NALSA verdict.