We, the members of Telangana Intersex Hijra Transgender Samiti of Hyderabad, request your solidarity in our fight for justice in this transphobic world.  After forty brutal attacks with knives and rocks on almost sixty transgender women in Hyderabad in the last year, our sister Pravallika was murdered in one such attack.  In the midst of our outrage over police inaction and complicity in her murder, another Hijra sister was picked up by the same KPHB station police claiming to investigate the murder and was stripped and tortured for hours.  This police brutality must be fought.

Join us in Hyderabad at Sundarayya Park, Baghlingampally at 5 pm, 24 January 2015, to protest and fight for justice. Please note change of venue from the previously proposed OU.

If you live outside Hyderabad, please organise solidarity demonstrations in your city.

Only a multitude of voices can combat the transphobic brutality faced by working class trans people on a daily basis.

Below are our statements on the murder of Pravallika and the sexual assault of the other Hijra sister.

JUSTICE FOR PRAVALLIKA

We, the members of the Telangana Intersex Hijra Transgender Samiti, denounce the dastardly acts of transphobic violence that led to the gruesome murder of Pravallika, our sister transgender in the wee hours of Saturday, 17th January 2015.

Transphobic violence has been on a steady rise in the recent past.  We, the Transgenders and Hijras, who are largely shunned by mainstream society, have no source of employment and livelihood.  We don’t get jobs even if they were to try hard and the fact is that NO ONE gives us jobs.  This fact is abundantly acknowledged by the apex court of the land in its NALSA Vs. UOI judgement.  We are consequently forced to live off beggary and sex work.  Despite the recent NALSA judgement of the Supreme court of India on 15th April 2014, the living conditions of Transgenders remain deplorable and sub-human.  No steps were taken to ameliorate the lives of Hijras and Transgenders despite the judgement of the honourable Supreme court.  Time and again, transgenders have been violently attacked in both Cyberabad and Hyderabad across police stations.  Despite our complaints across these police stations, action wasn’t taken till date to bring the perpetrators of violence to justice.

Over the past few quarters, Hijra sex workers have bled having been pelted with sharp and large stones, thrashed on their heads with beer bottles, stabbed and slit with sharp knives on their limbs, faces and genitalia and have been robbed of their hard earned income and savings.  Our homes were ransacked and our hard earned savings and valuables stolen.  We were harassed and publicly humiliated in our homes and neighbourhoods till extortionists obtained money from us.

Pravallika was born in a remote village of Telangana from a very poor back ground.  She always identified herself as a transgender and faced an enormous amount of stigma in throughout her lifetime.  She was a confident graduate with no opportunities and was constrained to eke a living out of beggary and sex work.  Despite all such odds, Pravillika was known by her friends as cheerful, positive and a vibrant transwoman.  Her life would not have been cut short if only the state and the police had acted on the complaints of Hijra and Transgender people and in time.

This case of ghastly gruesome murder of Pravallika is the culmination of the callousness and apathy of the state and the police.  We demand that the following at the earliest:

1. Fair and transparent investigation of Pravallika’s murder
2. Release of the post mortem report and FIR
3. Implementation of the NALSA judgement to provide education, employment and welfare schemes for Hijra and Transgender people

SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A HIJRA SISTER:

On the evening of Tuesday, 20th January 2015 i.e. yesterday, our friend, a Hijra sex worker was taken away for interrogation to the KPHB police station.  She is a colleague and friend of the late Pravallika and is also our friend.  On the pretext of interrogation, the police blamed her for conspiring to murder Pravallika and resorted to sub-human methods.  The police caught her while she was returning home from her hot spot and confiscated her mobile first to ensure that she couldn’t contact anyone for help.

Barely three days before this incident, the police had themselves urged her in our presence at the Gandhi hospital mortuary to continue going to the hot spot.  We were a minimum of twenty people who witnessed this request from the police.  They said that they suspected that Pravallika may have been murdered by her clients and hence wanted to use our Hijra friend as a bait and a decoy.  Despite this, she was treated like a criminal, DENUDED by policemen with the alleged reason of “checking whether or not she was really a transwoman”.  She had to remain nude for 4-5 hours as they manhandled and tortured her, questioning her transidentity all through, as she was uncastrated.  She told them that transidentity cannot and should not be restricted to a person body or be reduced to one’s anatomy as enshrined in the NALSA judgement but the police demonstrated total disregard for the NALSA Vs. UOI judgement of the Supreme court.

Naked as she was in the biting cold of a wintry night, she pleaded for her clothes but they couldn’t care.  Finally, with no other option left, she was constrained to reveal her HIV+ve status and explain that she is highly vulnerable to infections and that she can’t afford to be nude for so long in such cold weather.  Sadly, that too fell on deaf ears.  This only resulted in them keeping a safe distance from her having masked their noses and mouths but they didn’t return her clothes to her.  Our sister transgender is very ill now and struggling with the consequences of this torture.

Pravallika’s mobile is now on surveillance after her death.  Preliminary investigations revealed that some police personnel were in touch with her before her murder.   They claimed to be “just her friends”.  It is nothing new that the policemen who harass and torture Hijra people often seek free sexual favors from them and call themselves “just friends” when found in such compromising situations.   With this coming to light and the unusual urgency shown by the police to paint this case as an “intra-hijra feud leading to Pravallika’s murder”, the very role of the police appears suspect and perhaps complicit in this crime.

In addition, police have called other members of our Samiti, asked for sexual favours and asked intrusive questions about our genitals amounting to sexual harassment. 

As much as we would like to and wish to, we ARE NOT ABLE TO TRUST the police anymore and demand that the following at the earliest:

1. Immediate action be taken against the police personnel who sexual assaulted our Hijra sister by forcibly stripping her
2. Judicial enquiry for a free, fair and transparent investigation of Pravallika’s murder
3. Any investigation of Hijra/Trans women be done only by the ACP and in the ACP’s office, in the presence of a Samiti member and a lady police person and only during day time
4. Speedy implementation of the spirit of the NALSA judgement

Below is the copy of the complaint filed to Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, by S, the hijra woman who was assaulted by the police. Click to enlarge.

Verma Committee [Image Source: The Hindu]

Jan 24, 2013: The committee of Justice JS Verma, Justice Leila Seth and Gopal Subramaniam has released its report on amendment of criminal law surrounding rape in India. The report, released Jan 23, 2012, is may be download by clicking here.

The committee, constituted in the wake of the brutal Delhi gang rape of Dec 2012, received input from diverse communities, including legal experts, women’s groups, LGBT groups and others around the world.

The Committee proposes the following reframing of Section 375 (rape) definition as follows:

” 375. A man is said to commit rape if he—

(a) penetrates the vagina or anus or urethra of a person with—

(i) any part of his body including his penis or,
(ii) any object manipulated by him, except where such penetration is carried out for proper hygienic or medical purposes; or,

(b) manipulates any part of the body of a person so as to cause penetration of the vagina or anus or urethra of another person; or,

(c) engages in “cunnilingus” or “fellatio”, under the circumstances falling under any of the following six descriptions:

Firstly.—Against the person’s will; or,

Secondly.— Without the person’s consent; or,

Thirdly, With the person’s consent, where such consent has been obtained by putting the person, or any other person in whom the person is interested, in fear of death or of hurt; or,

Fourthly.— With the person’s consent, when the man induces the person to consent to the relevant act by impersonating another man to whom the victim would have otherwise knowingly consented to; or,

Fifthly, With the person’s consent, when at the time of giving such consent, by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by the man personally or through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, the person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the action to which he/she gives consent; or,

Sixthly, When the person is unable to communicate consent either express or impliedly.

Among the comments of the Justice Verma committee are the following observations on sexuality:

Page 51:

“65. We must also recognize that our society has the need to recognize different sexual orientations a human reality. In addition to homosexuality, bisexuality, and lesbianism, there also exists the transgender community. In view of the lack of scientific understanding of the different variations of orientation, even advanced societies have had to first declassify ‘homosexuality’ from being a mental disorder and now it is understood as a triangular development occasioned by evolution, partial conditioning and neurological underpinnings owing to genetic reasons. Further, we are clear that Article 15(c) of the constitution of India uses the word “sex” as including sexual orientation.”

The Commission affirms Naz on Page 54:
“Thus, if human rights of freedom mean anything, India cannot deny the citizens the right to be different. The state must not use oppressive and repressive labeling of despised sexuality. Thus the right to sexual orientation is a human right guaranteed by the fundamental principles of equality. We must also add that transgender communities are also entitled to an affirmation of gender autonomy. Our cultural prejudices must yield to constitutional principles of equality, empathy and respect.”

The Committee further notes [Page 406] that:

“a. Sexuality is a fundamental aspect of human life;

b. It covers physical, psychological, spiritual, social, economic, political and cultural dimensions;

c. Sexuality can be diverse; and

d. The rules which govern sexual behaviour differ widely across, and within, cultures and individuals.

f. Children need to be able to access informed, non-prejudiced sources on sexuality.

Challenging the perception of sexuality as being purely heterosexual is an ongoing agenda for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) activism and for counter-socialisation efforts. Collaborating or networking with LGBT activists is a beginning to understanding different sexuality experiences.

5. We are of the opinion that –

a. There must be a reduction of misinformation, be it through internet of misleading advertising;

b. Correct knowledge must be disseminated in respect of sexuality and sexual choices, without enforcing gender stereotypes;

c. The skills of children and young adults to make informed decisions need to be nurtured;

d. Perceptions and social norms need to be relooked at and revamped;

e. Children and young adults must be encouraged to increase communication with and within peer groups.

f. The use of theatrical resources and films in school workshops has proved to be extremely effective in gauging students’ responses towards understanding of gender relations and we recommend use of audiovisual material to encourage respect and understand for all genders/sexes.”

Finally, on the subject of gender-neutral laws, the Committee notes on Page 416 that

“Since the possibility of sexual assault on men, as well as homosexual, transgender and transsexual rape, is a reality, the provisions have to be cognizant of the same.”

Orinam notes: We are in overwhelming  agreement with the points raised by the Justice Verma committee, as they propose to make the law fully inclusive of the various forms of sexual assault  faced by women and LGBT people, moving beyond narrow definitions of rape that existed before, bringing marital rape within its ambit, and pointing out the violence inherent in such archaic methods as the two-finger test.

However, we wish to caution against use of the terms “homosexual, transgender and transsexual rape” as these are subject to misinterpretation concerning  the presumed sexuality and/or gender identity of the perpetrators and/or survivors.

While ‘homosexual rape’ in the sense of rape by homosexual men does exist (and such perpetrators must be brought to justice), we point out that the majority of male-on-male rapes are not perpetrated by homosexual men. Calling male-on-male rape ‘homosexual rape’ risks further stigmatizing those of an already stigmatized sexual orientation.

Further, pervasive homophobia in society causes many victims of male rape to remain silent on it, because of fear and shame associated with being labeled homosexual. We refer interested readers to Sandesh Sivakumaran’s article on the issue.

We also draw attention to many studies reporting that children who are effeminate boys, masculine girls and gay/lesbian/bisexual or transgender adults face disproportionate risk of sexual assault and rape, mostly from adult men who are not homosexual/bisexual themselves.

Given the above considerations, we suggest that a suitable rephrasing would be “male-on-male rape and rape of gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender persons.”

Recommended reading:

Rothman, Ellen and others. 2011. The prevalence of sexual assault against people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in the United States: a systematic review.Trauma, Violence and Abuse. 2011 Apr;12(2):55-66.

Sivakumaran, Sandesh. 2005. Male/male rape and the “taint” of homosexuality. Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 27, Number 4, November 2005, pp. 1274-1306

Among other things, I am a rape survivor.

I take my fingers off the keyboard for a little while and read that statement a few times. I add a prayer that being able to say it out loud will help me move on; that the ghosts that have been brought back to life with full force after the recent discussions about rape will begin to calm down and vanish into oblivion.

For several years now, I have debated in my head how to talk about it without falling into the many traps that have been laid out en route: how do I talk about it without generating a victim narrative? How do I talk about it without making rape pornography out of it? How do I talk about it as a man without making it sound like I am elbowing for space with women?

I was gang-raped twelve years ago. The men even video-taped it.  I was eighteen years old.  I hooked up with someone online and went to meet him at an agreed spot. From there on, things unfolded at a bizarre speed. I do not want to go into the details.  But I want to say some things:

Every time a friend mentions gay porn, I shudder in that panic that the video of my rape might be circulating online.

I don’t feel safe among unknown men. My stomach tightens. I try to make sure I don’t appear feminine in any way. Over the years, I have censored my body for survival.  I fear on a daily basis for the safety of my genderqueer friends.

When the memories of my rape history are triggered, I am scared of sleeping alone. Even in my own home. I try and go to a friend’s place. Or lie awake on my bed. And so that I do not worry my parents with my gaunt and hunted look, I try to be cheery, and it takes humungous effort to be so.

I fear that if I speak about this, people will forget the rape and will only blame me for hooking up with a stranger, for wanting sex, for wanting sex with another man. I fear that I will have to deal with the blame on top of dealing with the bodily memories of violence.

Whenever my lover uses a little extra physical force during sex, I shut down and shrink into my shell. He might mean it in passion, but my body reads it differently. I cannot participate.

Even when it happens to a man, rape IS gendered violence. It happened to me, because I was feminine, because the men thought I deserved it for not acting like a man. Sometimes rape is inflicted on men just to shame them; to, supposedly, insult their masculinity. In whatever way it happens, it loops back to the question of gender. This is ONE of the reasons my politics is grounded in feminism. This is one of the reasons I am a feminist. I was one even before I was raped by men. I didn’t need this violent lesson to turn feminist. But if I was to live with it, I decided to make this experience of violence, which I now felt in my bones, an embodied site of my feminism. I don’t need it to be feminist. But since I have it, since I am unable to erase it, I have tried to make use of it to understand gendered violence, to understand body and performance, to understand myself and this world just a little bit more.  But I didn’t ask for the violence. And there is nothing redemptive in my attempts to utilize the experience for something else. It is simply my courage and will to move on.

Orinam editors’ note: If reading this account brings you or someone you know/love memories of similar experiences, please check out some of the resources we are compiling for survivors.